LeetCode Problem

How to Solve Contains Duplicate III

To solve the Contains Duplicate III problem, we use a sliding window approach combined with running state updates to track the most recent elements. The goal is to find indices (i, j) where the difference in their values is within the specified range, and their indices are also within the allowed range. This requires efficient data structures for tracking elements and ensuring the constraints are met.

GhostInterview Help

Need help with Contains Duplicate III without spending extra time grinding it?

GhostInterview can read Contains Duplicate III from a screenshot, generate the answer path, explain the complexity, and support solver-first interview workflows when you need direct help fast.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.

Problem #220Sliding window with running state updatesReviewed 2026-03-07
Difficulty
Hard
Primary pattern
Sliding window with running state updates
Answer-first problem summary
Step-by-step approach and complexity
GhostInterview solver workflow

To solve the Contains Duplicate III problem, we use a sliding window approach combined with running state updates to track the most recent elements. The goal is to find indices (i, j) where the difference in their values is within the specified range, and their indices are also within the allowed range. This requires efficient data structures for tracking elements and ensuring the constraints are met.

Problem Statement

You are given an integer array nums and two integers, indexDiff and valueDiff. Your task is to find a pair of indices (i, j) such that the following conditions hold:

  1. abs(i - j) <= indexDiff, 2. abs(nums[i] - nums[j]) <= valueDiff, and 3. i != j. Return true if such a pair exists, otherwise return false.

Examples

Example 1

Input: nums = [1,2,3,1], indexDiff = 3, valueDiff = 0

Output: true

We can choose (i, j) = (0, 3). We satisfy the three conditions: i != j --> 0 != 3 abs(i - j) abs(0 - 3) abs(1 - 1) <= 0

Example 2

Input: nums = [1,5,9,1,5,9], indexDiff = 2, valueDiff = 3

Output: false

After trying all the possible pairs (i, j), we cannot satisfy the three conditions, so we return false.

Constraints

  • 2 <= nums.length <= 105
  • -109 <= nums[i] <= 109
  • 1 <= indexDiff <= nums.length
  • 0 <= valueDiff <= 109

Solution Approach

Sliding Window with Running State Updates

The problem can be solved using a sliding window approach combined with running state updates. As we iterate through the array, we maintain a window of size indexDiff, ensuring that elements within this window meet the valueDiff condition. This ensures that we only need to check a limited number of elements at any given time, optimizing performance.

Efficient Data Structure Usage

To maintain the window and check the conditions efficiently, an ordered set or a bucket sort can be used. These structures allow fast lookups and updates, helping us quickly determine whether a valid pair exists within the window. The choice of data structure impacts the overall time complexity.

Handling Edge Cases

Edge cases, such as arrays with small lengths or when the difference in values is zero, must be handled carefully. Special conditions where no valid pair can be found should also be considered, and we must ensure that the window slides correctly when the indexDiff constraint is near the array’s bounds.

Complexity Analysis

MetricValue
TimeDepends on the final approach
SpaceDepends on the final approach

The time complexity of this problem depends on the approach and the data structure used. Using a sliding window with efficient data structures like an ordered set or bucket sort can result in an O(n log k) time complexity, where n is the length of the array and k is the window size. Space complexity is O(k) due to the space required for storing the elements in the window.

What Interviewers Usually Probe

  • Look for understanding of sliding window techniques combined with efficient state management.
  • Assess the candidate's ability to handle edge cases where no valid pair exists.
  • Evaluate the candidate's knowledge of data structures like ordered sets or bucket sorts for optimization.

Common Pitfalls or Variants

Common pitfalls

  • Overlooking the need for an efficient data structure to track the sliding window.
  • Failing to properly manage the constraints, especially when dealing with large inputs.
  • Incorrectly handling edge cases, such as when the valueDiff is zero or when no valid pair exists.

Follow-up variants

  • Allow a larger range for indexDiff and valueDiff, making the sliding window approach more complex.
  • Limit the array length, requiring optimization of both space and time complexity.
  • Implement the solution without relying on specific data structures like ordered sets, which may require a brute-force approach.

How GhostInterview Helps

  • GhostInterview provides step-by-step guidance on how to apply the sliding window technique combined with running state updates efficiently.
  • It assists in understanding how data structures like ordered sets and bucket sort help optimize the solution, ensuring you focus on the right approach.
  • The platform highlights common pitfalls to avoid, such as failing to handle edge cases, and offers solutions to ensure you can tackle any scenario that arises.

Topic Pages

FAQ

What is the sliding window technique in Contains Duplicate III?

The sliding window technique helps to efficiently track elements within a range of indices. It limits the number of elements checked at once, which is critical for optimizing performance in problems like Contains Duplicate III.

How do I handle edge cases in Contains Duplicate III?

Edge cases include arrays of small length or situations where no valid pair satisfies the constraints. Properly managing the window size and handling these cases is essential to solving the problem correctly.

What is the time complexity of the sliding window approach for Contains Duplicate III?

Using a sliding window with an efficient data structure results in a time complexity of O(n log k), where n is the length of the array and k is the window size.

How do ordered sets help in solving Contains Duplicate III?

Ordered sets allow for fast lookups and updates, ensuring that we can efficiently check if the current window meets the valueDiff condition. They help maintain an optimized solution for larger arrays.

What are the potential pitfalls when solving Contains Duplicate III?

Common pitfalls include failing to use the correct data structure to manage the sliding window, neglecting edge cases, and not optimizing for large input sizes, leading to suboptimal performance.

GhostInterview Solver

Need direct help with Contains Duplicate III instead of spending more time grinding it?

Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Contains Duplicate III from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.