LeetCode Problem

How to Solve Delete Greatest Value in Each Row

Start by sorting each row to easily identify the largest remaining element. Remove the maximum from each row per iteration, summing them. Repeat until all columns are exhausted to obtain the final total efficiently, leveraging array sorting for predictable selection.

GhostInterview Help

Need help with Delete Greatest Value in Each Row without spending extra time grinding it?

GhostInterview can read Delete Greatest Value in Each Row from a screenshot, generate the answer path, explain the complexity, and support solver-first interview workflows when you need direct help fast.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.

Problem #2500Array plus SortingReviewed 2026-03-08
Difficulty
Easy
Primary pattern
Array plus Sorting
Answer-first problem summary
Step-by-step approach and complexity
GhostInterview solver workflow

Start by sorting each row to easily identify the largest remaining element. Remove the maximum from each row per iteration, summing them. Repeat until all columns are exhausted to obtain the final total efficiently, leveraging array sorting for predictable selection.

Problem Statement

You are given an m x n matrix grid filled with positive integers. In each step, select the largest remaining value from each row and remove it from the matrix. Continue removing the greatest values until all columns are empty, summing all removed numbers.

After each removal, the number of columns decreases by one. Return the total sum of all values removed during this process. Each selection in a row should always pick the current maximum, reflecting the array plus sorting pattern.

Examples

Example 1

Input: grid = [[1,2,4],[3,3,1]]

Output: 8

The diagram above shows the removed values in each step.

  • In the first operation, we remove 4 from the first row and 3 from the second row (notice that, there are two cells with value 3 and we can remove any of them). We add 4 to the answer.
  • In the second operation, we remove 2 from the first row and 3 from the second row. We add 3 to the answer.
  • In the third operation, we remove 1 from the first row and 1 from the second row. We add 1 to the answer. The final answer = 4 + 3 + 1 = 8.

Example 2

Input: grid = [[10]]

Output: 10

The diagram above shows the removed values in each step.

  • In the first operation, we remove 10 from the first row. We add 10 to the answer. The final answer = 10.

Constraints

  • m == grid.length
  • n == grid[i].length
  • 1 <= m, n <= 50
  • 1 <= grid[i][j] <= 100

Solution Approach

Sort Rows for Easy Maximum Selection

Sort each row of the matrix in descending order so the largest unremoved element is always at a known index. This avoids scanning each row for the maximum in every iteration.

Iterative Column Removal

Iterate column by column: for each column index, remove the element at that position from every row and accumulate the sum. This directly simulates the process while preserving array order.

Use Priority Structures if Needed

For larger matrices or variable row lengths, a heap or priority queue per row can track maximums efficiently. Pop the largest from each row in each iteration and sum the values until all elements are removed.

Complexity Analysis

MetricValue
TimeDepends on the final approach
SpaceDepends on the final approach

Time complexity is O(m * n log n) for sorting all rows and O(m * n) for iterative removal, resulting in O(m * n log n). Space complexity is O(1) extra if sorting in place, or O(m * n) if storing sorted copies.

What Interviewers Usually Probe

  • Watch for off-by-one errors when columns shrink after each removal.
  • Check if sorting each row up front reduces repeated maximum searches.
  • Be aware that multiple identical maximums in a row can be removed in any order, the sum remains correct.

Common Pitfalls or Variants

Common pitfalls

  • Forgetting that the number of columns decreases each iteration leads to index errors.
  • Not sorting rows first can result in inefficient repeated maximum searches.
  • Adding all removed elements instead of only the current maximum per row will give wrong total.

Follow-up variants

  • Calculate sum of minimum values removed from each row instead of maximums.
  • Apply the same operation but only on specific columns based on a condition.
  • Handle rectangular matrices where rows have different lengths after removals.

How GhostInterview Helps

  • GhostInterview sorts each row automatically to highlight maximum selection points.
  • It tracks column removal iterations efficiently, showing cumulative sum step by step.
  • It flags repeated maximums and marks visited cells to prevent counting errors.

Topic Pages

FAQ

What is the main pattern used in Delete Greatest Value in Each Row?

The problem primarily uses the array plus sorting pattern, where each row is sorted to efficiently pick maximums.

How do I handle multiple identical maximums in a row?

You can remove any one of the identical maximums, as the total sum remains the same, the key is to select a maximum per iteration.

What is the time complexity for this problem?

Sorting each row gives O(m * n log n), and iterating through all columns adds O(m * n), so overall time complexity is O(m * n log n).

Can I use a heap to solve this problem?

Yes, using a heap per row lets you efficiently track and remove the largest element in each iteration, which is helpful for larger matrices.

What common mistakes should I avoid?

Avoid forgetting column reduction after each iteration, not sorting rows upfront, and accidentally summing all row elements instead of only the maximums.

GhostInterview Solver

Need direct help with Delete Greatest Value in Each Row instead of spending more time grinding it?

Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Delete Greatest Value in Each Row from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.