The problem asks to rearrange barcodes such that no two adjacent barcodes are the same. A greedy strategy with hash table lookups can help select the most common elements efficiently, ensuring the correct placement of each barcode. A heap structure could be leveraged for choosing the next barcode in the sequence.
Problem Statement
Given an array of barcodes, rearrange the array such that no two adjacent barcodes are the same. It is guaranteed that a solution exists for the given input.
Your task is to return any valid arrangement of the barcodes satisfying the condition. The input array has a length between 1 and 10,000, and each element in the array represents a barcode with an integer value between 1 and 10,000.
Examples
Example 1
Input: barcodes = [1,1,1,2,2,2]
Output: [2,1,2,1,2,1]
Example details omitted.
Example 2
Input: barcodes = [1,1,1,1,2,2,3,3]
Output: [1,3,1,3,1,2,1,2]
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= barcodes.length <= 10000
- 1 <= barcodes[i] <= 10000
Solution Approach
Greedy Approach with Hash Table
Use a hash table to count the frequency of each barcode, then select the most frequent barcode to place next. This ensures the barcode with the highest availability is placed in the sequence first. Adjust the frequency count after each placement.
Heap for Optimal Selection
A max heap (priority queue) can be used to always select the most frequent barcode that hasn’t been placed next to a duplicate. The heap stores barcodes along with their frequencies, and after placing a barcode, the heap is updated to reflect the new frequency.
Array Scanning for Efficient Rearrangement
After selecting the next barcode, scan the array to find an appropriate position to place the barcode, ensuring that no adjacent barcodes are the same. This step is repeated until all elements are placed.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity depends on the method used for selecting barcodes. Using a hash table and heap for selection results in O(n log k) time, where n is the length of the array and k is the number of unique barcodes. Space complexity is O(k) for the storage of frequencies and heap.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Candidates who use a greedy approach with heap selection and hash tables are likely on the right track.
- Look for candidates who efficiently update barcode counts after placing each element in the sequence.
- Candidates who rely on brute force without using efficient data structures may struggle with larger inputs.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not updating the barcode frequency after each placement, which can lead to incorrect placements of barcodes.
- Ignoring edge cases where fewer barcode types are present in the array.
- Inefficient approaches that do not utilize data structures like heaps or hash tables can lead to slower solutions.
Follow-up variants
- Try with arrays containing only one type of barcode to test if the algorithm handles this edge case.
- Consider arrays with large numbers of unique barcode types to evaluate the efficiency of the heap-based solution.
- Test cases with arrays that require precise placement of barcodes at specific indices.
How GhostInterview Helps
- GhostInterview helps by breaking down the problem into manageable steps, focusing on greedy strategies with hash table and heap utilization.
- It encourages candidates to use optimal data structures like heaps for efficient barcode selection, ensuring minimal adjacent duplicates.
- GhostInterview aids in preparing for challenges with larger inputs by emphasizing the importance of efficient algorithms and data structures.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
How do I solve the 'Distant Barcodes' problem?
The problem can be solved using a greedy approach with a hash table to count frequencies, followed by a heap for optimal barcode selection.
What is the time complexity of solving the Distant Barcodes problem?
The time complexity is O(n log k), where n is the number of barcodes, and k is the number of unique barcodes.
What data structure should be used for the Distant Barcodes problem?
A hash table for counting frequencies and a heap for selecting the most frequent barcode are optimal data structures.
Are there any edge cases I should be aware of?
Consider arrays with only one barcode type or arrays where the barcode count is low compared to the total array length.
How does GhostInterview help with this problem?
GhostInterview provides step-by-step guidance on how to apply greedy algorithms, hash tables, and heaps to solve the problem efficiently.
Need direct help with Distant Barcodes instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Distant Barcodes from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Task Scheduler is solved by counting task frequencies and computing how cooldown gaps force idle slots around the most frequent task.
Open problem page#1090 Largest Values From LabelsMaximize the sum of selected item values while respecting label use limits using array scanning and hash tracking.
Open problem page#1338 Reduce Array Size to The HalfThis problem asks to minimize the set of integers removed to reduce an array's size to at least half by removing occurrences of selected integers.
Open problem page