LeetCode Problem

How to Solve Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array

The problem asks you to find the minimum element in a rotated sorted array. This can be efficiently solved using binary search, leveraging the fact that the array was originally in ascending order. By identifying the point of rotation, you can find the minimum element in O(log n) time complexity.

GhostInterview Help

Need help with Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array without spending extra time grinding it?

GhostInterview can read Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array from a screenshot, generate the answer path, explain the complexity, and support solver-first interview workflows when you need direct help fast.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.

Problem #153Binary search over the valid answer spaceReviewed 2026-03-08
Difficulty
Medium
Primary pattern
Binary search over the valid answer space
Answer-first problem summary
Step-by-step approach and complexity
GhostInterview solver workflow

The problem asks you to find the minimum element in a rotated sorted array. This can be efficiently solved using binary search, leveraging the fact that the array was originally in ascending order. By identifying the point of rotation, you can find the minimum element in O(log n) time complexity.

Problem Statement

Given a sorted array that has been rotated between 1 and n times, the task is to find the minimum element in this rotated array. The array contains unique integers and can be as large as 5000 elements. The array was originally sorted in ascending order, and now it's been rotated.

For example, the array nums = [3, 4, 5, 1, 2] was originally [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] but was rotated 3 times. The goal is to return the minimum element in the array, which in this case would be 1. You need to implement an efficient algorithm to solve this problem.

Examples

Example 1

Input: nums = [3,4,5,1,2]

Output: 1

The original array was [1,2,3,4,5] rotated 3 times.

Example 2

Input: nums = [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]

Output: 0

The original array was [0,1,2,4,5,6,7] and it was rotated 4 times.

Example 3

Input: nums = [11,13,15,17]

Output: 11

The original array was [11,13,15,17] and it was rotated 4 times.

Constraints

  • n == nums.length
  • 1 <= n <= 5000
  • -5000 <= nums[i] <= 5000
  • All the integers of nums are unique.
  • nums is sorted and rotated between 1 and n times.

Solution Approach

Binary Search Approach

The optimal solution to this problem leverages binary search. Since the array is rotated, there is a pivot point where the order of elements changes. By comparing the middle element with the rightmost element, we can determine which half of the array contains the minimum. This approach has a time complexity of O(log n).

Identifying the Pivot

The core idea behind binary search for this problem is to identify the pivot where the array rotation occurred. The left side of the pivot will always contain larger elements, while the right side will contain the smaller elements. By adjusting the search boundaries based on the pivot comparison, we can efficiently find the minimum element.

Edge Case Consideration

It's important to consider edge cases like when the array is not rotated at all (the array is already in ascending order). In such cases, the first element is the minimum, and no rotation needs to be considered. The binary search will handle this scenario without any issues.

Complexity Analysis

MetricValue
TimeDepends on the final approach
SpaceDepends on the final approach

The time complexity of the solution is O(log n) due to the binary search method, where n is the length of the array. This is optimal for large arrays, as each iteration halves the search space. The space complexity is O(1) since the algorithm does not require extra space for data storage.

What Interviewers Usually Probe

  • Candidate demonstrates understanding of binary search for searching in rotated arrays.
  • Candidate is able to identify the pivot point and explain how binary search narrows down the minimum element.
  • Candidate should address edge cases and explain the solution's efficiency.

Common Pitfalls or Variants

Common pitfalls

  • Incorrectly identifying the pivot, leading to an inefficient or incorrect solution.
  • Not handling the case where the array is not rotated, resulting in unnecessary computations.
  • Using a brute force approach (O(n)) instead of binary search, missing the performance benefits.

Follow-up variants

  • Find the maximum element in a rotated sorted array.
  • Find the minimum element in a rotated sorted array with duplicate elements.
  • Find the rotation point in the array without explicitly finding the minimum element.

How GhostInterview Helps

  • GhostInterview helps you solve the problem by providing hints on optimizing your approach using binary search.
  • By simulating the interview experience, GhostInterview trains you to efficiently solve problems within time limits, like in this case with O(log n).
  • The solver gives you immediate feedback on edge cases, helping you understand when your binary search logic is faulty or inefficient.

Topic Pages

FAQ

What is the main algorithmic approach for solving the 'Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array' problem?

The main approach is binary search, which allows you to identify the pivot point in the rotated array and find the minimum element in O(log n) time.

How does binary search work in the context of finding the minimum in a rotated array?

In binary search, the array is split into two halves. By comparing the middle element with the rightmost element, we can determine which half contains the minimum, narrowing the search range until we find it.

What is the time complexity of the solution for this problem?

The time complexity is O(log n) because binary search reduces the problem size by half with each iteration, making it much more efficient than a brute-force O(n) solution.

Are there any edge cases I need to consider when solving this problem?

Yes, edge cases include when the array is not rotated at all, where the first element will be the minimum. Also, consider arrays with only one element, where the minimum is trivially the single element.

Can I solve this problem using a brute-force approach?

While a brute-force solution with O(n) time complexity will work, it is less efficient compared to the optimal O(log n) solution using binary search.

GhostInterview Solver

Need direct help with Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array instead of spending more time grinding it?

Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.