LeetCode Problem

How to Solve Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings

To solve Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings, immediately map each string to a normalized key representing its even and odd characters sorted separately. Use a hash set to store unique keys and return its size. This method directly leverages array scanning plus hash lookup, ensuring correct grouping without redundant comparisons and handles strings of varying arrangements.

GhostInterview Help

Need help with Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings without spending extra time grinding it?

GhostInterview can read Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings from a screenshot, generate the answer path, explain the complexity, and support solver-first interview workflows when you need direct help fast.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.

Problem #893Array scanning plus hash lookupReviewed 2026-03-07
Difficulty
Medium
Primary pattern
Array scanning plus hash lookup
Answer-first problem summary
Step-by-step approach and complexity
GhostInterview solver workflow

To solve Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings, immediately map each string to a normalized key representing its even and odd characters sorted separately. Use a hash set to store unique keys and return its size. This method directly leverages array scanning plus hash lookup, ensuring correct grouping without redundant comparisons and handles strings of varying arrangements.

Problem Statement

Given an array of strings where each string has the same length, you can perform a move by swapping any two characters at even indices or any two characters at odd indices within a string. Determine how many groups of special-equivalent strings exist.

Two strings are special-equivalent if you can make them identical by performing any number of such moves. Your task is to compute the total count of unique groups formed under this rule for the given array.

Examples

Example 1

Input: words = ["abcd","cdab","cbad","xyzz","zzxy","zzyx"]

Output: 3

One group is ["abcd", "cdab", "cbad"], since they are all pairwise special equivalent, and none of the other strings is all pairwise special equivalent to these. The other two groups are ["xyzz", "zzxy"] and ["zzyx"]. Note that in particular, "zzxy" is not special equivalent to "zzyx".

Example 2

Input: words = ["abc","acb","bac","bca","cab","cba"]

Output: 3

Example details omitted.

Constraints

  • 1 <= words.length <= 1000
  • 1 <= words[i].length <= 20
  • words[i] consist of lowercase English letters.
  • All the strings are of the same length.

Solution Approach

Normalize Strings Using Even-Odd Character Sorting

For each string, separate characters at even and odd indices, sort each group independently, and combine them to form a normalized key. This ensures that all special-equivalent strings map to the same key.

Use a Hash Set to Track Unique Groups

Store each normalized key in a hash set while scanning the array. The number of unique keys in the set after processing all strings equals the number of special-equivalent groups.

Iterate Efficiently and Avoid Redundant Comparisons

Scan each string once and avoid pairwise comparisons. Sorting even and odd characters separately reduces complexity and guarantees correct grouping regardless of string arrangement.

Complexity Analysis

MetricValue
TimeDepends on the final approach
SpaceDepends on the final approach

Time complexity is O(N * L log L), where N is the number of strings and L is the string length due to sorting characters at even and odd indices. Space complexity is O(N * L) to store normalized keys in the hash set.

What Interviewers Usually Probe

  • Focus on array scanning rather than naive pairwise string comparison.
  • Look for efficient grouping using hash-based normalization.
  • Be prepared to explain why sorting even and odd characters separately guarantees correctness.

Common Pitfalls or Variants

Common pitfalls

  • Attempting pairwise comparisons between all strings leading to O(N^2) time.
  • Failing to separate even and odd indices when generating keys.
  • Assuming identical sorted full strings is sufficient for equivalence.

Follow-up variants

  • Consider strings of varying lengths and how normalization would change.
  • Compute group sizes instead of just the number of groups.
  • Count groups under additional constraints, such as limiting moves.

How GhostInterview Helps

  • Automatically generates normalized keys for even-odd index sorting.
  • Tracks unique groups efficiently using hash sets without manual bookkeeping.
  • Highlights potential pitfalls like pairwise comparisons or misgrouping.

Topic Pages

FAQ

What defines a special-equivalent string in this problem?

Two strings are special-equivalent if you can swap any even-indexed characters or any odd-indexed characters to make them identical.

Why do we sort even and odd indices separately?

Sorting ensures all strings that can transform into each other through allowed swaps produce the same normalized key for hashing.

Can this approach handle arrays with 1000 strings of length 20?

Yes, because it scans each string once and uses hash sets, keeping operations within acceptable time and space limits.

Is pairwise comparison necessary to determine groups?

No, using normalized keys with hash sets eliminates the need for O(N^2) pairwise checks.

How does this solution tie to the 'Array scanning plus hash lookup' pattern?

It scans each array element once to compute a key and uses a hash lookup to track unique groups efficiently, matching the pattern.

GhostInterview Solver

Need direct help with Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings instead of spending more time grinding it?

Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Groups of Special-Equivalent Strings from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.