This problem requires calculating the fewest replacements to make arr1 strictly increasing by choosing elements from arr2. A state transition dynamic programming approach lets you track the last valid value and minimum operations at each index. Sorting arr2 and using binary search optimizes replacements, preventing unnecessary iterations and handling edge cases where no solution exists.
Problem Statement
You are given two integer arrays, arr1 and arr2. You can perform operations where you replace an element in arr1 with any element from arr2, aiming to make arr1 strictly increasing.
Return the minimum number of replacement operations required to achieve a strictly increasing arr1. If it is impossible to make arr1 strictly increasing through any sequence of replacements, return -1.
Examples
Example 1
Input: arr1 = [1,5,3,6,7], arr2 = [1,3,2,4]
Output: 1
Replace 5 with 2, then arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 6, 7].
Example 2
Input: arr1 = [1,5,3,6,7], arr2 = [4,3,1]
Output: 2
Replace 5 with 3 and then replace 3 with 4. arr1 = [1, 3, 4, 6, 7].
Example 3
Input: arr1 = [1,5,3,6,7], arr2 = [1,6,3,3]
Output: -1
You can't make arr1 strictly increasing.
Constraints
- 1 <= arr1.length, arr2.length <= 2000
- 0 <= arr1[i], arr2[i] <= 10^9
Solution Approach
Sort and Deduplicate arr2
Sort arr2 to allow efficient binary search for replacements and remove duplicates to prevent redundant operations that do not improve the strictly increasing property.
Dynamic Programming with State Tracking
Use a map or dictionary to track the minimum number of operations needed to reach each possible last value at every index in arr1. Transition states by either keeping the current element if it maintains strictly increasing order or replacing it using the next larger element from arr2 found via binary search.
Binary Search Optimization
For each element in arr1, use binary search on arr2 to find the smallest replacement that is larger than the previous element. Update the dynamic programming states with the minimum operations, ensuring efficiency within O(m * n * log n) time.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(m \cdot n \cdot\log n) |
| Space | O(n) |
Time complexity is O(m * n * log n) because for each element in arr1 (length m) you may consider all elements in arr2 (length n) with a binary search. Space complexity is O(n) for storing the current dynamic programming states corresponding to arr2 values after deduplication.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Checks understanding of dynamic programming state transitions for arrays.
- Tests ability to optimize with binary search in sorted replacement arrays.
- Evaluates handling of impossible cases and edge conditions in sequence transformations.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Ignoring the need to sort and deduplicate arr2, leading to redundant checks.
- Failing to properly track multiple states in dynamic programming, causing incorrect minimal operation counts.
- Assuming a solution exists for all inputs, without checking impossible cases.
Follow-up variants
- Find minimum replacements to make arr1 non-decreasing instead of strictly increasing.
- Allow replacement elements from arr2 only at even indices of arr1.
- Count the number of different strictly increasing sequences achievable with minimal replacements.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Identifies optimal dynamic programming state transitions for each index in arr1.
- Shows how to combine binary search with DP to minimize operations efficiently.
- Highlights edge cases where no solution exists and prevents unnecessary computation.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the main approach for Make Array Strictly Increasing?
Use state transition dynamic programming combined with binary search on a sorted arr2 to minimize replacements.
Can arr1 be made strictly increasing without replacements?
Yes, if the original arr1 is already strictly increasing, zero operations are needed.
Why sort arr2 for this problem?
Sorting arr2 allows efficient binary search to find the next valid replacement for arr1 elements while maintaining strictly increasing order.
What if no strictly increasing sequence is possible?
Return -1, as some arr1 configurations cannot be fixed with any selection from arr2.
Does dynamic programming handle all edge cases?
Yes, by tracking all possible last values and minimal operations at each index, DP ensures correct results including impossible scenarios.
Need direct help with Make Array Strictly Increasing instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Make Array Strictly Increasing from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Compute the maximum profit from non-overlapping jobs using state transition dynamic programming with sorted arrays and binary search.
Open problem page#792 Number of Matching SubsequencesGiven a string s and a list of words, count how many words are subsequences of s using efficient array scanning and hash lookup.
Open problem page#2008 Maximum Earnings From TaxiMaximize earnings by optimizing taxi ride selection and tips using array scanning, hash lookups, and sorting.
Open problem page