The task is to verify if given matchsticks can form a square by dividing them into 4 equal-length sides. The solution leverages dynamic programming and backtracking, especially using bit manipulation for efficient state transitions.
Problem Statement
You are given an array of integers, where each value represents the length of a matchstick. The goal is to use all the matchsticks to form a square. No matchstick can be broken, but they can be joined together to form the sides of a square.
Return true if it is possible to arrange all the matchsticks to form a square, otherwise return false.
Examples
Example 1
Input: matchsticks = [1,1,2,2,2]
Output: true
You can form a square with length 2, one side of the square came two sticks with length 1.
Example 2
Input: matchsticks = [3,3,3,3,4]
Output: false
You cannot find a way to form a square with all the matchsticks.
Constraints
- 1 <= matchsticks.length <= 15
- 1 <= matchsticks[i] <= 108
Solution Approach
State Transition Dynamic Programming
This problem can be approached using state transition dynamic programming. The key is to represent the state as a bitmask, where each bit corresponds to whether a matchstick is used. This allows efficient transition between states when trying to build the square's sides.
Backtracking with Pruning
The backtracking approach tries to place each matchstick on one of the four sides of the square. Pruning is used to cut off search paths when it's impossible to complete a square, improving performance by reducing the number of recursive calls.
Bitmask Optimization
By using bitmasking to represent subsets of matchsticks, we can optimize the backtracking search. This technique reduces the complexity by enabling faster checks and transitions, especially when the number of matchsticks is large.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(N \times 2^N) |
| Space | O(N + 2^N) |
The time complexity is O(N × 2^N), where N is the number of matchsticks, as we check all possible subsets of matchsticks. The space complexity is O(N + 2^N) due to the storage of bitmask states and the recursive calls.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Ability to identify the state transition dynamic programming approach.
- Skill in applying backtracking and pruning to reduce search space.
- Familiarity with bitmasking for optimizing combinatorial problems.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not considering the pruning step, leading to unnecessary recursion.
- Misunderstanding the problem as needing to partition into 3 parts instead of 4.
- Inefficient state representation, which can result in slow performance for larger inputs.
Follow-up variants
- What if the matchsticks had to form a rectangle instead of a square?
- How would the problem change if we were given a fixed perimeter for the square?
- What if we needed to divide the matchsticks into multiple squares instead of just one?
How GhostInterview Helps
- GhostInterview guides you through state transition dynamic programming, helping you understand bitmask optimization and backtracking techniques.
- Our solver presents a systematic approach to problem-solving, emphasizing pruning and efficient recursion to avoid time-limit exceed errors.
- The platform walks you through the exact problem structure and failure modes, enabling you to understand the decision-making process behind dynamic programming solutions.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the primary approach to solve the Matchsticks to Square problem?
The primary approach is state transition dynamic programming, which efficiently handles the combinatorial nature of the problem using bitmasking.
How does pruning help with backtracking in this problem?
Pruning eliminates paths where forming a square is impossible, reducing the number of recursive calls and speeding up the process.
What is the time complexity of the solution?
The time complexity is O(N × 2^N), where N is the number of matchsticks.
How can bitmasking optimize the solution?
Bitmasking allows efficient representation and checking of subsets of matchsticks, speeding up state transitions during the backtracking process.
What is the key to solving the problem efficiently?
The key is using dynamic programming with bitmasking to reduce the complexity of tracking which matchsticks are used and where to place them.
Need direct help with Matchsticks to Square instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Matchsticks to Square from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
The Beautiful Arrangement problem asks for the number of valid permutations of n integers satisfying specific divisibility conditions.
Open problem page#638 Shopping OffersMinimize the cost of purchasing items using available special offers with state transition dynamic programming.
Open problem page#691 Stickers to Spell WordDetermine the minimum number of stickers needed to spell a target word using array scanning and hash lookups for efficient letter tracking.
Open problem page