To solve Max Consecutive Ones III, start by prioritizing flips that extend existing sequences of 1s. Use a sliding window to track the current subarray and count zeros inside it. Adjust the window dynamically whenever the zero count exceeds k to ensure only valid sequences are considered, guaranteeing an optimal solution while minimizing unnecessary checks.
Problem Statement
Given a binary array nums and an integer k, determine the maximum length of a contiguous subarray of 1s that can be obtained by flipping at most k zeros to 1s. Each flip should be used to extend an existing block of consecutive 1s for maximum effect.
Return the length of the longest subarray that satisfies this condition. Constraints ensure nums contains only 0s and 1s, and the length of nums ranges from 1 to 10^5, with 0 <= k <= nums.length.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0], k = 2
Output: 6
[1,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,1] Bolded numbers were flipped from 0 to 1. The longest subarray is underlined.
Example 2
Input: nums = [0,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1], k = 3
Output: 10
[0,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1] Bolded numbers were flipped from 0 to 1. The longest subarray is underlined.
Constraints
- 1 <= nums.length <= 105
- nums[i] is either 0 or 1.
- 0 <= k <= nums.length
Solution Approach
Sliding Window with Zero Count
Maintain a window [left, right] over nums and count the number of zeros inside. Expand the right boundary while the zero count <= k. If zeros exceed k, move left forward until the window is valid again. Track the maximum window size throughout.
Binary Search over Window Size
Consider using binary search to test possible window lengths. For each candidate length, check if a window exists with at most k zeros. Adjust search boundaries based on feasibility. This leverages the primary pattern of searching over valid answer space efficiently.
Prefix Sum Optimization
Precompute a prefix sum array of zeros to quickly query the number of zeros in any subarray. This allows constant-time validation for any candidate window, reducing redundant counting when sliding or binary searching.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n) for sliding window, O(n log n) if using binary search over window size, and space complexity is O(1) for sliding window or O(n) for prefix sum. Each method aligns with the maximum-consecutive-ones pattern and handles large input efficiently.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Focus on maximizing 1s using minimal zero flips.
- Consider the sliding window as the main pattern for handling consecutive sequences.
- Be aware of off-by-one errors when adjusting the window boundaries.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Flipping zeros that do not extend a 1s sequence, wasting k flips.
- Failing to shrink the window correctly when zero count exceeds k.
- Incorrectly updating maximum length after window adjustment.
Follow-up variants
- Return the subarray itself instead of its length.
- Allow flipping zeros with different weights or costs.
- Find maximum consecutive ones for multiple queries of k in the same array.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Automatically tracks zero flips and sliding window boundaries to ensure valid sequences.
- Highlights when a zero flip extends a block versus when it is wasted, enforcing optimal strategy.
- Provides dynamic updates of the maximum subarray length to avoid miscalculations.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the optimal approach for Max Consecutive Ones III?
Use a sliding window to count zeros and expand or shrink the window based on k flips allowed, ensuring the longest 1s sequence.
Can binary search be applied to Max Consecutive Ones III?
Yes, binary search over the possible window lengths combined with prefix sums can validate feasibility efficiently.
Why do we track zeros inside the window?
Tracking zeros ensures we do not exceed k flips, which is the key constraint for forming the maximum consecutive ones subarray.
What mistakes should be avoided when implementing this pattern?
Avoid flipping zeros that don't extend 1s sequences, mishandling window boundaries, or forgetting to update the max length after adjustment.
Does prefix sum improve performance in this problem?
Yes, prefix sums allow constant-time zero counts for any subarray, optimizing validation during sliding or binary search methods.
Need direct help with Max Consecutive Ones III instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Max Consecutive Ones III from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Find the shortest subarray with a sum of at least k using binary search and sliding window techniques.
Open problem page#713 Subarray Product Less Than KCount subarrays with a product strictly less than a given value k using efficient algorithms like binary search and sliding window.
Open problem page#1658 Minimum Operations to Reduce X to ZeroFind the minimum number of operations to reduce a value x to zero by removing elements from an array.
Open problem page