LeetCode Problem

How to Solve Max Number of K-Sum Pairs

To solve the Max Number of K-Sum Pairs problem, iterate through the array while using a hash table to track potential pairings. This allows efficient identification of valid pairs that sum up to k. By counting how many such pairs can be removed, you can calculate the maximum number of operations.

GhostInterview Help

Need help with Max Number of K-Sum Pairs without spending extra time grinding it?

GhostInterview can read Max Number of K-Sum Pairs from a screenshot, generate the answer path, explain the complexity, and support solver-first interview workflows when you need direct help fast.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.

Problem #1679Array scanning plus hash lookupReviewed 2026-03-07
Difficulty
Medium
Primary pattern
Array scanning plus hash lookup
Answer-first problem summary
Step-by-step approach and complexity
GhostInterview solver workflow

To solve the Max Number of K-Sum Pairs problem, iterate through the array while using a hash table to track potential pairings. This allows efficient identification of valid pairs that sum up to k. By counting how many such pairs can be removed, you can calculate the maximum number of operations.

Problem Statement

Given an integer array nums and an integer k, your task is to determine how many operations you can perform. In each operation, you must find two numbers in nums whose sum equals k, remove them, and continue until no more such pairs exist.

Return the maximum number of such operations. Each pair you remove must consist of disjoint elements, meaning once an element is used in a pair, it cannot be reused in another operation.

Examples

Example 1

Input: nums = [1,2,3,4], k = 5

Output: 2

Starting with nums = [1,2,3,4]:

  • Remove numbers 1 and 4, then nums = [2,3]
  • Remove numbers 2 and 3, then nums = [] There are no more pairs that sum up to 5, hence a total of 2 operations.

Example 2

Input: nums = [3,1,3,4,3], k = 6

Output: 1

Starting with nums = [3,1,3,4,3]:

  • Remove the first two 3's, then nums = [1,4,3] There are no more pairs that sum up to 6, hence a total of 1 operation.

Constraints

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 105
  • 1 <= nums[i] <= 109
  • 1 <= k <= 109

Solution Approach

Hash Table Approach

First, initialize a hash table to count occurrences of each number in the array. Then, for each element in the array, check if its complement (k - num) exists in the hash table. If so, a pair can be formed, and both elements are removed from the hash table. This approach ensures we efficiently find pairs and avoid counting the same pair multiple times.

Greedy Pairing with Array Traversal

After populating the hash table, iterate through the array and greedily find pairs. For each number, attempt to match it with its complement. If both elements exist in the hash table, count it as a valid pair and reduce their respective counts. This ensures that each element is used only once in a pair.

Optimizing with Two Pointers

Sort the array, and then use a two-pointer technique to traverse the sorted array. One pointer starts at the beginning, and the other at the end. If the sum of the elements at the two pointers equals k, count it as a valid pair and move both pointers inward. If the sum is less than k, move the left pointer rightward, and if it is greater than k, move the right pointer leftward.

Complexity Analysis

MetricValue
TimeDepends on the final approach
SpaceDepends on the final approach

The time complexity depends on the final approach: Using a hash table results in O(n) time complexity, while sorting the array for the two-pointer approach brings it to O(n log n). Space complexity is O(n) due to the hash table storing counts of each element in nums.

What Interviewers Usually Probe

  • The candidate demonstrates knowledge of hash tables for efficiently pairing elements.
  • The candidate employs greedy algorithms or two-pointer techniques to find pairs in linear time.
  • The candidate shows understanding of time-space trade-offs when deciding between hash table and sorting approaches.

Common Pitfalls or Variants

Common pitfalls

  • Failing to check if elements are still available in the hash table before forming pairs can lead to overcounting.
  • Not handling edge cases like no pairs existing or repeated elements in the array.
  • Using inefficient approaches like brute force pair finding, which would result in O(n^2) time complexity.

Follow-up variants

  • Modify the problem to find k-sum pairs instead of pairs, expanding the problem to larger sums.
  • Change the problem so that you need to return the sum of the elements in the valid pairs.
  • Add constraints where the array contains duplicates, and elements can only be used once in all pairs.

How GhostInterview Helps

  • GhostInterview helps by guiding you through the array scanning and hash lookup approach, ensuring an optimal solution.
  • The tool assists by showing detailed solutions with variations on how to handle different edge cases efficiently.
  • It provides instant feedback on time and space complexity, helping you understand trade-offs in the problem-solving process.

Topic Pages

FAQ

What is the approach to solving Max Number of K-Sum Pairs?

You can solve this problem using a hash table to store element counts or by applying the two-pointer technique after sorting the array.

What is the time complexity of the hash table approach?

The hash table approach runs in O(n) time, where n is the length of the array.

How do I avoid reusing elements in pairs?

By ensuring that once a pair is formed, both elements are removed or reduced in the hash table or array.

What if the array contains duplicates in Max Number of K-Sum Pairs?

Duplicates can still form valid pairs as long as they satisfy the sum condition, and each element can only be used once.

Can I use brute force to solve Max Number of K-Sum Pairs?

Brute force is not efficient and should be avoided because it leads to a time complexity of O(n^2). A hash table or two-pointer approach is much more efficient.

GhostInterview Solver

Need direct help with Max Number of K-Sum Pairs instead of spending more time grinding it?

Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Max Number of K-Sum Pairs from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.