The maximum length of a pair chain is found by combining sorting and state transition dynamic programming. By sorting pairs and applying a greedy choice or DP table, you track the longest chain possible at each step. This approach ensures no invalid overlaps and efficiently finds the chain length in O(n log n) time using sorting and either O(n) or O(n^2) dynamic programming evaluation.
Problem Statement
You are given an array of n pairs where each pair is [lefti, righti] and lefti < righti. A pair p2 = [c, d] can follow p1 = [a, b] if b < c. Form a chain of such pairs by connecting following pairs sequentially.
Return the length of the longest possible chain that can be formed from the given pairs. Ensure that each pair is only used once and that the chain respects the order condition b < c for consecutive pairs.
Examples
Example 1
Input: pairs = [[1,2],[2,3],[3,4]]
Output: 2
The longest chain is [1,2] -> [3,4].
Example 2
Input: pairs = [[1,2],[7,8],[4,5]]
Output: 3
The longest chain is [1,2] -> [4,5] -> [7,8].
Constraints
- n == pairs.length
- 1 <= n <= 1000
- -1000 <= lefti < righti <= 1000
Solution Approach
Sort pairs by right element
Begin by sorting all pairs based on their second value. Sorting ensures the greedy selection of pairs can extend the chain without violating the b < c constraint. This ordering simplifies the chain extension and reduces unnecessary comparisons.
Dynamic programming table
Create a DP array where dp[i] represents the longest chain ending at pair i. For each pair i, check all previous pairs j and update dp[i] if pairs[j][1] < pairs[i][0]. This uses the state transition dynamic programming pattern directly tied to this problem.
Greedy chain extension
After sorting, maintain a variable for the current chain end. Iterate through pairs and extend the chain only when the current pair starts after the last chain end. This reduces time complexity to O(n log n) while still respecting pair ordering.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Sorting takes O(n log n). DP evaluation can be O(n^2) if checking all previous pairs, but greedy chain extension after sorting runs in O(n). Space complexity is O(n) for DP array or O(1) for greedy tracking.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Focus on sorting pairs by the second element to simplify chain selection.
- Expect a DP or greedy approach based on the state transition dynamic programming pattern.
- Be prepared to discuss time vs space trade-offs between O(n^2) DP and O(n log n) greedy solution.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to sort pairs first can lead to incorrect chain lengths.
- Incorrectly updating DP table without checking b < c condition.
- Mixing up greedy selection order can produce invalid chains.
Follow-up variants
- Compute the longest decreasing chain by reversing pair comparisons.
- Allow overlapping chains and count maximum compatible subsets instead of strict chains.
- Extend to 3D triplets where each subsequent element must be larger in all dimensions.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Automatically identifies optimal pair ordering and dynamic programming states.
- Highlights failure modes like invalid overlaps and incorrect greedy updates.
- Provides step-by-step chain length calculation tailored to Maximum Length of Pair Chain problem.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the main pattern used in Maximum Length of Pair Chain?
The problem primarily uses state transition dynamic programming, combined with greedy sorting to efficiently build the longest chain.
Can this problem be solved without dynamic programming?
Yes, a greedy approach after sorting by the second element can achieve O(n log n) time while maintaining correctness.
What common mistakes should I avoid?
Do not skip sorting, forget the b < c condition, or incorrectly extend chains without tracking the last end.
What is the time complexity for the DP approach?
Sorting is O(n log n), and evaluating all previous pairs in DP makes it O(n^2). Greedy reduces evaluation to O(n).
How do I track the longest chain efficiently?
Maintain either a DP array for state transitions or a single variable for the last chain end during greedy iteration.
Need direct help with Maximum Length of Pair Chain instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Maximum Length of Pair Chain from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Determine the minimum number of intervals to remove from a list to ensure no intervals overlap using dynamic programming and greedy insights.
Open problem page#1262 Greatest Sum Divisible by ThreeFind the maximum sum divisible by three from a given array using dynamic programming and state transition.
Open problem page#1363 Largest Multiple of ThreeFind the largest number divisible by three by selecting and ordering digits optimally using state transition dynamic programming techniques.
Open problem page