The goal is to find the maximum number of achievable transfer requests that can be satisfied while ensuring that each building has a net zero transfer. This is done by applying a backtracking approach with pruning. Efficient pruning is key to cutting off unnecessary branches during the search process.
Problem Statement
You are given a set of buildings and a list of transfer requests between them. Each request indicates a transfer from one building to another. The challenge is to find the maximum number of transfer requests that can be successfully executed while satisfying the condition that each building has a net zero transfer (i.e., the number of employees leaving equals the number of employees arriving).
This problem can be approached using backtracking and pruning techniques, where the search space is reduced by eliminating infeasible transfer combinations early in the process. With constraints on building capacity and the nature of the problem, this problem tests your ability to manage computational complexity while trying to maximize the number of feasible transfers.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 5, requests = [[0,1],[1,0],[0,1],[1,2],[2,0],[3,4]]
Output: 5 Explantion: Let's see the requests: From building 0 we have employees x and y and both want to move to building 1. From building 1 we have employees a and b and they want to move to buildings 2 and 0 respectively. From building 2 we have employee z and they want to move to building 0. From building 3 we have employee c and they want to move to building 4. From building 4 we don't have any requests. We can achieve the requests of users x and b by swapping their places. We can achieve the requests of users y, a and z by swapping the places in the 3 buildings.
Example details omitted.
Example 2
Input: n = 3, requests = [[0,0],[1,2],[2,1]]
Output: 3 Explantion: Let's see the requests: From building 0 we have employee x and they want to stay in the same building 0. From building 1 we have employee y and they want to move to building 2. From building 2 we have employee z and they want to move to building 1. We can achieve all the requests.
Example details omitted.
Example 3
Input: n = 4, requests = [[0,3],[3,1],[1,2],[2,0]]
Output: 4
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= n <= 20
- 1 <= requests.length <= 16
- requests[i].length == 2
- 0 <= fromi, toi < n
Solution Approach
Backtracking with Pruning
To solve this problem, a backtracking approach can be used to explore all potential transfer combinations. For each request, we try to either include or exclude it from the solution space. Pruning helps cut off branches that lead to infeasible solutions, such as when the net transfer in any building becomes non-zero.
Bit Manipulation for Efficient State Tracking
Bit manipulation helps efficiently represent and track the current state of employee transfers between buildings. Each building's net transfer can be stored as a bitmask, which simplifies the checking of valid solutions and aids in quickly identifying infeasible combinations.
Optimization through Branch Cutting
As the problem is NP-hard, optimizing the search process is crucial. Branch cutting is done when a building's transfer net becomes unbalanced, reducing the number of iterations needed to explore all combinations.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(2^(M * (M + N)) |
| Space | O(N) |
The time complexity is O(2^(M * (M + N))) due to the combination of backtracking and pruning. The space complexity is O(N), where N represents the number of buildings. Efficient pruning and bitmasking contribute to managing the large number of possible combinations.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Candidate demonstrates understanding of backtracking with pruning techniques.
- Candidate effectively utilizes bit manipulation for optimization.
- Candidate identifies early pruning conditions to limit unnecessary exploration.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failure to implement proper pruning leads to excessive exploration of infeasible branches.
- Not optimizing state representation, which can lead to slow performance.
- Overlooking the importance of checking net transfers early during the backtracking process.
Follow-up variants
- Consider optimizing the pruning strategy to handle larger inputs.
- Explore dynamic programming approaches to compare with backtracking.
- Investigate greedy methods for approximate solutions in specific cases.
How GhostInterview Helps
- GhostInterview helps guide through the backtracking search process with pruning and bit manipulation techniques.
- It provides examples to explain the steps of optimizing the solution space and ensuring maximum feasible transfers.
- GhostInterview offers hints to handle common pitfalls, such as premature pruning or inefficient state tracking.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the maximum number of achievable transfer requests in the "Maximum Number of Achievable Transfer Requests" problem?
The problem asks for the maximum number of transfer requests that can be fulfilled while ensuring that each building has a net zero transfer, meaning the number of employees leaving is equal to the number arriving.
How does backtracking help solve the problem?
Backtracking is used to explore all possible combinations of transfer requests. By pruning branches that lead to invalid solutions (like imbalanced transfers), we efficiently narrow down the search space.
What is pruning in the context of this problem?
Pruning involves eliminating infeasible solutions during the backtracking process, such as when the net transfer for any building becomes unbalanced. This saves computation time by avoiding unnecessary exploration of invalid paths.
How can bit manipulation be used in solving this problem?
Bit manipulation allows for efficient tracking of the state of employee transfers across buildings. Each building's net transfer can be represented as a bitmask, which helps quickly check if a solution is valid.
What is the time complexity of the "Maximum Number of Achievable Transfer Requests" problem?
The time complexity is O(2^(M * (M + N))), where M is the number of transfer requests and N is the number of buildings. This arises due to the backtracking approach with pruning, which explores all possible transfer combinations.
Need direct help with Maximum Number of Achievable Transfer Requests instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Maximum Number of Achievable Transfer Requests from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Compute the sum of all subset XOR totals using a backtracking search with pruning for arrays of small size.
Open problem page#2044 Count Number of Maximum Bitwise-OR SubsetsDetermine the number of non-empty subsets that achieve the maximum bitwise OR using efficient backtracking and pruning strategies.
Open problem page#2151 Maximum Good People Based on StatementsDetermine the maximum number of good people in a group given mutual statements, using precise backtracking with pruning.
Open problem page