LeetCode Problem

How to Solve Maximum Points in an Archery Competition

Bob competes against Alice in an archery game where both have fixed arrow counts. To maximize his points, Bob must choose his arrow distribution carefully while adhering to the total arrow limit and trying to beat Alice's scores in each section. This problem leverages backtracking and pruning for optimal solutions.

GhostInterview Help

Need help with Maximum Points in an Archery Competition without spending extra time grinding it?

GhostInterview can read Maximum Points in an Archery Competition from a screenshot, generate the answer path, explain the complexity, and support solver-first interview workflows when you need direct help fast.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.

Problem #2212Backtracking search with pruningReviewed 2026-03-08
Difficulty
Medium
Primary pattern
Backtracking search with pruning
Answer-first problem summary
Step-by-step approach and complexity
GhostInterview solver workflow

Bob competes against Alice in an archery game where both have fixed arrow counts. To maximize his points, Bob must choose his arrow distribution carefully while adhering to the total arrow limit and trying to beat Alice's scores in each section. This problem leverages backtracking and pruning for optimal solutions.

Problem Statement

Alice and Bob are participating in an archery competition. You are given an integer numArrows, representing the total number of arrows they can shoot, and an integer array aliceArrows of size 12, where each element corresponds to the number of arrows Alice shot in each scoring section of the competition. Bob wants to maximize his total score while ensuring the sum of his arrows across all sections equals numArrows.

Return an array bobArrows of size 12, representing the number of arrows Bob should shoot in each section, such that the sum of bobArrows equals numArrows. The goal is to find a distribution of arrows for Bob that maximizes his total score, which is the sum of the scores he earns by beating Alice's shots in each section.

Examples

Example 1

Input: numArrows = 9, aliceArrows = [1,1,0,1,0,0,2,1,0,1,2,0]

Output: [0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,2,3,1]

The table above shows how the competition is scored. Bob earns a total point of 4 + 5 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 = 47. It can be shown that Bob cannot obtain a score higher than 47 points.

Example 2

Input: numArrows = 3, aliceArrows = [0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2]

Output: [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0]

The table above shows how the competition is scored. Bob earns a total point of 8 + 9 + 10 = 27. It can be shown that Bob cannot obtain a score higher than 27 points.

Constraints

  • 1 <= numArrows <= 105
  • aliceArrows.length == bobArrows.length == 12
  • 0 <= aliceArrows[i], bobArrows[i] <= numArrows
  • sum(aliceArrows[i]) == numArrows

Solution Approach

Backtracking with Pruning

This problem is solved through a backtracking approach with pruning. You need to consider different distributions of arrows Bob could use while ensuring the total is equal to numArrows. For each distribution, check if Bob's score is greater than Alice's in any given section and prune invalid paths early.

Bit Manipulation for Efficiency

In some cases, bit manipulation can be used to optimize the solution, especially when trying to represent the state of Bob's arrow distribution efficiently and evaluate different possibilities quickly. This can reduce the complexity in certain backtracking scenarios.

Greedy Selection of Sections

While backtracking is central, it is helpful to focus on sections where Bob can outscore Alice with the fewest arrows possible. This greedy strategy can reduce the number of computations by selecting promising sections first and pruning other possibilities.

Complexity Analysis

MetricValue
TimeDepends on the final approach
SpaceDepends on the final approach

The time and space complexity depends on the final approach used. In the worst case, it could be exponential due to the number of possible arrow distributions. However, by using pruning techniques and bit manipulation, the complexity can be reduced significantly.

What Interviewers Usually Probe

  • Candidate suggests using backtracking with pruning to explore different arrow distributions.
  • Candidate attempts to optimize the solution using greedy selection or bit manipulation techniques.
  • Candidate demonstrates an understanding of how pruning reduces unnecessary calculations in this problem.

Common Pitfalls or Variants

Common pitfalls

  • Failing to prune invalid paths early can lead to excessive computation and timeouts.
  • Not considering edge cases where numArrows is small or very large can lead to incorrect solutions.
  • Misunderstanding the problem's goal, such as incorrectly distributing arrows without considering the competition's scoring system.

Follow-up variants

  • Alter the number of sections (reduce or increase the size of the aliceArrows array).
  • Introduce additional constraints on the number of arrows Bob can shoot in each section.
  • Consider allowing a greater number of arrows or a limit on how many sections Bob must outscore Alice.

How GhostInterview Helps

  • GhostInterview assists by providing a direct implementation of the backtracking search with pruning, highlighting its use in this exact problem.
  • GhostInterview guides you through complex scenarios, ensuring you don’t fall into common pitfalls like over-exploring unnecessary paths.
  • GhostInterview’s step-by-step solution breakdown ensures you can handle edge cases and optimize the solution effectively.

Topic Pages

FAQ

How does backtracking with pruning work in the "Maximum Points in an Archery Competition" problem?

Backtracking with pruning helps by exploring all possible arrow distributions, while pruning cuts off branches where Bob cannot beat Alice’s score, thus reducing unnecessary computations.

What role does bit manipulation play in this problem?

Bit manipulation can be used to efficiently manage and track arrow distributions, speeding up the backtracking process and reducing the space complexity.

Can a greedy approach be used to solve the "Maximum Points in an Archery Competition" problem?

Yes, a greedy approach can be helpful in selecting sections where Bob can beat Alice with the fewest arrows, which can optimize the solution by focusing on the most promising sections first.

What are the major pitfalls to avoid in this problem?

Key pitfalls include failing to prune invalid paths early, not considering all edge cases, and misunderstanding how to distribute arrows based on Alice's scores.

How does GhostInterview help with this problem?

GhostInterview provides a structured approach to implementing the backtracking algorithm, optimizes the process using pruning, and guides you through common pitfalls in solving this problem.

GhostInterview Solver

Need direct help with Maximum Points in an Archery Competition instead of spending more time grinding it?

Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Maximum Points in an Archery Competition from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.

Screenshot Input

Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.

Answer + Complexity

Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.

Stealth Workflow

Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.