This problem requires minimizing the maximum sum of pairs formed from an even-length array. Sorting the array and pairing elements optimally using two pointers can solve this efficiently. The goal is to balance the sums to achieve the minimized maximum pair sum.
Problem Statement
Given an array of even length, you need to pair up its elements optimally to minimize the maximum pair sum. The pair sum of two elements is the sum of the pair (a, b) where sum = a + b. Your task is to return the minimized maximum sum of all pairs formed.
You should consider using sorting to help with pairing the elements. By pairing the smallest and largest elements first, you can balance the sum and reduce the maximum pair sum.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [3,5,2,3]
Output: 7
The elements can be paired up into pairs (3,3) and (5,2).
The maximum pair sum is max(3+3, 5+2) = max(6, 7) = 7.
Example 2
Input: nums = [3,5,4,2,4,6]
Output: 8
The elements can be paired up into pairs (3,5), (4,4), and (6,2).
The maximum pair sum is max(3+5, 4+4, 6+2) = max(8, 8, 8) = 8.
Constraints
- n == nums.length
- 2 <= n <= 105
- n is even.
- 1 <= nums[i] <= 105
Solution Approach
Sort and Two-pointer Approach
Sort the array and use two pointers: one starting from the beginning and the other from the end. Pair the elements at these pointers together, and adjust the pointers inward, ensuring that you always pair the smallest unpaired element with the largest.
Greedy Pairing Strategy
The greedy approach minimizes the maximum pair sum by ensuring that the sum of each pair is as balanced as possible. By sorting the array and pairing the extremes, this strategy aims to reduce the worst-case pair sum.
Invariant Tracking
Maintain an invariant during the two-pointer scanning process, tracking the maximum pair sum as you pair the elements. This invariant ensures that you always have the optimal configuration without needing to reevaluate the entire array.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Sorting the array takes O(n log n) time. The two-pointer scanning process runs in O(n), so the overall time complexity is O(n log n). Space complexity is O(1) if the sorting is done in-place.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Look for understanding of the greedy pairing technique.
- Evaluate the candidate's ability to optimize through sorting.
- Check if the candidate efficiently handles larger arrays with the two-pointer approach.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to sort the array before pairing, leading to suboptimal pairings.
- Misunderstanding the importance of balancing the pairs to minimize the maximum sum.
- Overcomplicating the problem by attempting to pair elements randomly rather than using a structured approach.
Follow-up variants
- Pairing elements with constraints on pair sums.
- Optimizing pair sums for a larger range of values.
- Extending the problem to odd-length arrays with different pairing strategies.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Guides you through understanding how sorting can optimize pairing strategies.
- Provides detailed step-by-step assistance in applying two-pointer scanning for optimal results.
- Helps you focus on minimizing the pair sums with a balanced approach, making the process clear and efficient.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
How do you minimize the maximum pair sum in the array?
The optimal approach is to sort the array and then use two-pointer scanning to pair the smallest and largest elements, ensuring balanced pair sums.
What is the time complexity of the solution?
The time complexity is O(n log n) due to the sorting step, and the two-pointer scanning takes O(n) time.
Can the solution be optimized further?
The solution is already quite efficient with O(n log n) complexity. Further optimization is unlikely unless the problem constraints change.
Why does sorting help in this problem?
Sorting allows you to pair the smallest and largest elements, minimizing the maximum sum and achieving a more balanced solution.
What pattern is used in this problem?
This problem primarily uses a two-pointer scanning technique combined with a greedy strategy and sorting to achieve optimal pairings.
Need direct help with Minimize Maximum Pair Sum in Array instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Minimize Maximum Pair Sum in Array from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Maximize the number of tasks that can be completed by efficiently using workers and magical pills.
Open problem page#2234 Maximum Total Beauty of the GardensDetermine the maximum total beauty of gardens by strategically planting flowers using binary search over achievable flower counts.
Open problem page#2406 Divide Intervals Into Minimum Number of GroupsDetermine the minimum number of non-overlapping groups for a set of intervals using precise two-pointer scanning logic.
Open problem page