This problem requires modeling the grid as a graph where each cell is a node and moving into obstacles adds cost. Using a BFS variant, prioritize paths with fewer obstacles removed to reach the bottom-right efficiently. The solution guarantees the minimum removals by exploring all reachable paths systematically with a priority queue or 0-1 BFS.
Problem Statement
You are given a 0-indexed m x n grid containing 0s and 1s, where 0 represents an empty cell and 1 represents an obstacle. You can move up, down, left, or right from an empty cell to another cell.
Return the minimum number of obstacles you must remove to travel from the top-left corner (0, 0) to the bottom-right corner (m - 1, n - 1). You must plan paths to minimize removals, considering each obstacle as a weighted edge in a graph traversal.
Examples
Example 1
Input: grid = [[0,1,1],[1,1,0],[1,1,0]]
Output: 2
We can remove the obstacles at (0, 1) and (0, 2) to create a path from (0, 0) to (2, 2). It can be shown that we need to remove at least 2 obstacles, so we return 2. Note that there may be other ways to remove 2 obstacles to create a path.
Example 2
Input: grid = [[0,1,0,0,0],[0,1,0,1,0],[0,0,0,1,0]]
Output: 0
We can move from (0, 0) to (2, 4) without removing any obstacles, so we return 0.
Constraints
- m == grid.length
- n == grid[i].length
- 1 <= m, n <= 105
- 2 <= m * n <= 105
- grid[i][j] is either 0 or 1.
- grid[0][0] == grid[m - 1][n - 1] == 0
Solution Approach
Model the grid as a weighted graph
Treat each cell as a node and edges between adjacent cells with weight 0 for empty cells and 1 for obstacles. This sets up the grid for BFS or Dijkstra-style traversal.
Use BFS with obstacle prioritization
Implement 0-1 BFS using a deque or a priority queue to always expand the path with the fewest obstacles removed first, ensuring minimal removals are counted accurately.
Track visited states with minimal removals
Maintain a matrix of minimum obstacles removed to reach each cell to avoid revisiting with higher cost, preventing redundant exploration and guaranteeing optimal paths.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(m \cdot n) |
| Space | O(m \cdot n) |
Time complexity is O(m \cdot n) because each cell is processed at most once in BFS. Space complexity is O(m \cdot n) to store the minimum removals matrix and the BFS queue or deque.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Check if the candidate models grid as a graph with weighted edges.
- Look for correct BFS prioritization by obstacle count.
- Watch for handling visited states to avoid revisiting higher-cost paths.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Treating all moves equally instead of assigning cost to obstacles.
- Revisiting cells without checking if a path with fewer removals exists.
- Failing to handle edge cases where the start or end is surrounded by obstacles.
Follow-up variants
- Compute the minimum obstacles removal for multiple target cells instead of a single corner.
- Allow diagonal moves and adjust BFS weights accordingly.
- Return one actual path along with the minimum obstacle count.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Automatically models the grid as a weighted graph for BFS traversal.
- Tracks minimal obstacle removals efficiently using 0-1 BFS or priority queue.
- Highlights missteps like revisiting higher-cost paths or ignoring obstacle weights.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the main pattern used in Minimum Obstacle Removal to Reach Corner?
The core pattern is graph traversal with breadth-first search, treating obstacles as edges with cost to find minimal removal paths.
Can we move diagonally in this problem?
No, only up, down, left, and right moves are allowed, as diagonal moves would change the BFS edge weights and solution.
How do we track visited states effectively?
Use a matrix of the same size as the grid to record the minimal number of obstacles removed to reach each cell, ensuring no higher-cost revisits.
What data structure helps prioritize fewer obstacle paths?
A deque for 0-1 BFS or a min-heap priority queue can prioritize expansion of paths with fewer obstacles removed.
What is the expected time complexity for this problem?
The expected time complexity is O(m \cdot n) because each cell is visited at most once while exploring all paths efficiently.
Need direct help with Minimum Obstacle Removal to Reach Corner instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Minimum Obstacle Removal to Reach Corner from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Compute the fastest path in a grid where each cell has a minimum time requirement using BFS and priority queue techniques.
Open problem page#1368 Minimum Cost to Make at Least One Valid Path in a GridDetermine the minimum cost to create at least one valid path from the top-left to bottom-right in a directional grid.
Open problem page#3286 Find a Safe Walk Through a GridDetermine if you can safely traverse a binary grid from top-left to bottom-right using limited health points.
Open problem page