To solve the 'Relocate Marbles' problem, simulate the process of relocating marbles from one position to another. You will be given initial positions and instructions to move marbles. After completing all moves, return the sorted list of occupied positions. This problem highlights the importance of array scanning and hash lookup for efficient simulation of moves.
Problem Statement
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums representing the initial positions of some marbles. You are also given two 0-indexed integer arrays moveFrom and moveTo of equal length. Each element of moveFrom represents a position where marbles are initially located, and each element of moveTo represents the new position where these marbles should be moved.
Throughout moveFrom.length steps, you will change the positions of the marbles. On the ith step, you will move all marbles from position moveFrom[i] to position moveTo[i]. After completing all the steps, return the sorted list of positions that are occupied by at least one marble.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [1,6,7,8], moveFrom = [1,7,2], moveTo = [2,9,5]
Output: [5,6,8,9]
Initially, the marbles are at positions 1,6,7,8. At the i = 0th step, we move the marbles at position 1 to position 2. Then, positions 2,6,7,8 are occupied. At the i = 1st step, we move the marbles at position 7 to position 9. Then, positions 2,6,8,9 are occupied. At the i = 2nd step, we move the marbles at position 2 to position 5. Then, positions 5,6,8,9 are occupied. At the end, the final positions containing at least one marbles are [5,6,8,9].
Example 2
Input: nums = [1,1,3,3], moveFrom = [1,3], moveTo = [2,2]
Output: [2]
Initially, the marbles are at positions [1,1,3,3]. At the i = 0th step, we move all the marbles at position 1 to position 2. Then, the marbles are at positions [2,2,3,3]. At the i = 1st step, we move all the marbles at position 3 to position 2. Then, the marbles are at positions [2,2,2,2]. Since 2 is the only occupied position, we return [2].
Constraints
- 1 <= nums.length <= 105
- 1 <= moveFrom.length <= 105
- moveFrom.length == moveTo.length
- 1 <= nums[i], moveFrom[i], moveTo[i] <= 109
- The test cases are generated such that there is at least a marble in moveFrom[i] at the moment we want to apply the ith move.
Solution Approach
Array Scanning
This solution first scans the initial positions of the marbles in nums and stores them in a set for efficient lookups. This avoids the need to track duplicates in subsequent moves, as sets automatically manage unique entries.
Simulate Marble Movement
Next, simulate each move step-by-step by iterating through moveFrom and moveTo. For each step, remove the marble from moveFrom[i] and add it to moveTo[i]. This step ensures marbles are moved as instructed.
Sorting the Result
After all moves are complete, the remaining positions are sorted. The sorted list ensures that the final output is in the correct order of occupied positions, as required by the problem.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity depends on the approach used to track and simulate the movements. If using a set to manage unique positions, the time complexity is O(n + m log m), where n is the length of nums and m is the number of unique final positions. Sorting the final list of positions requires O(m log m) time, and each move takes constant time with a set lookup.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Can the candidate efficiently handle updates to the positions of multiple marbles in each move?
- Does the candidate consider using a set or hash map to manage the unique positions of marbles?
- Is the candidate able to optimize the sorting step to avoid unnecessary computation?
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to account for the possibility of multiple marbles being moved to the same position.
- Not using efficient data structures like sets to handle unique positions and optimize the move process.
- Overcomplicating the sorting step or failing to sort the final result efficiently.
Follow-up variants
- Handle a case where
nums,moveFrom, andmoveTohave large sizes and test for performance. - Consider scenarios where marbles can move from a position to the same position multiple times, ensuring no unnecessary changes are made.
- Explore different ways of sorting the final list, such as using a priority queue or quicksort for optimization.
How GhostInterview Helps
- GhostInterview assists by providing step-by-step breakdowns of array scanning and hash lookup methods, improving efficiency in simulating moves.
- It helps identify where a set or map can be leveraged to optimize the solution for handling large numbers of moves and positions.
- The solver guidance provides tips for handling edge cases, ensuring that sorting and marbles' movements are correctly managed.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
How can I solve the 'Relocate Marbles' problem efficiently?
By using array scanning combined with a set or hash map to manage unique positions, you can simulate the marble movements efficiently, and then sort the final list.
What is the time complexity for 'Relocate Marbles'?
The time complexity is O(n + m log m), where n is the length of nums and m is the number of unique final positions after all moves.
Can this problem be solved using sorting?
Sorting is used at the end to return the list of occupied positions in sorted order, but the main challenge is efficiently simulating the marble movements using array scanning and hash lookup.
What is the purpose of using a set in the solution?
A set is used to efficiently manage unique positions of marbles, preventing duplicates and ensuring that only unique positions are considered in the final result.
What are some common mistakes in solving 'Relocate Marbles'?
Common mistakes include failing to manage duplicate positions correctly, not using sets for efficient lookups, and overcomplicating the sorting step.
Need direct help with Relocate Marbles instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Relocate Marbles from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
The problem involves marking elements in an array and calculating the score based on adjacent elements.
Open problem page#3080 Mark Elements on Array by Performing QueriesEfficiently mark elements in an array based on queries using scanning plus hash lookup to track marked indices and compute sums.
Open problem page#2402 Meeting Rooms IIIDetermine which meeting room holds the most meetings by simulating room assignments with precise time tracking.
Open problem page