In the Scramble String problem, we need to determine whether one string can be rearranged to form another using recursive divisions and swaps. The solution involves dynamic programming with state transitions, tracking whether each possible scramble is valid. Efficient memoization is key to avoiding redundant calculations.
Problem Statement
You are given two strings, s1 and s2, both of the same length. The task is to determine if s2 is a scrambled version of s1. A string is considered scrambled if it can be transformed into another by recursively dividing it at random points and swapping the resulting substrings.
For example, for s1 = "great" and s2 = "rgeat", the string s1 can be transformed into s2 by recursively dividing and swapping the substrings. If such a transformation is possible, return true. If it’s not, return false. The challenge is to use dynamic programming to check all possible transformations.
Examples
Example 1
Input: s1 = "great", s2 = "rgeat"
Output: true
One possible scenario applied on s1 is: "great" --> "gr/eat" // divide at random index. "gr/eat" --> "gr/eat" // random decision is not to swap the two substrings and keep them in order. "gr/eat" --> "g/r / e/at" // apply the same algorithm recursively on both substrings. divide at random index each of them. "g/r / e/at" --> "r/g / e/at" // random decision was to swap the first substring and to keep the second substring in the same order. "r/g / e/at" --> "r/g / e/ a/t" // again apply the algorithm recursively, divide "at" to "a/t". "r/g / e/ a/t" --> "r/g / e/ a/t" // random decision is to keep both substrings in the same order. The algorithm stops now, and the result string is "rgeat" which is s2. As one possible scenario led s1 to be scrambled to s2, we return true.
Example 2
Input: s1 = "abcde", s2 = "caebd"
Output: false
Example details omitted.
Example 3
Input: s1 = "a", s2 = "a"
Output: true
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- s1.length == s2.length
- 1 <= s1.length <= 30
- s1 and s2 consist of lowercase English letters.
Solution Approach
State Transition DP
The problem can be solved using dynamic programming by keeping track of valid scrambles at each substring level. We maintain a 3D DP table where dp[i][j][k] indicates if a substring starting at index i of s1 can be scrambled to form a substring starting at index j of s2 with length k.
Memoization to Optimize Computation
Memoization helps store the results of previously computed subproblems to avoid redundant calculations. This is crucial to reducing the time complexity of the solution from O(n^6) to O(n^4), making the algorithm feasible within the problem’s constraints.
Recursive Split and Swap
The string can be recursively divided at various points, and for each division, we either swap or retain the order of the substrings. The recursive nature of the problem is handled by iterating over all possible split points and checking both scenarios: with and without swapping.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n^4) |
| Space | O(n^3) |
The time complexity is O(n^4) due to the nested loops for both substring length and starting positions, along with memoization that helps to avoid redundant recalculations. Space complexity is O(n^3), as we store results for all substrings of s1 and s2 at every level of recursion.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- The candidate demonstrates understanding of dynamic programming by explaining the state transition approach and memoization.
- The candidate recognizes the importance of efficiently handling recursive calls using memoization to avoid recomputation.
- The candidate may struggle with the recursive nature of the problem if they fail to correctly identify the base cases or transitions.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- The candidate may overlook the importance of memoization, leading to a time complexity of O(n^6) instead of O(n^4).
- Failing to account for both swap and non-swap scenarios in recursive calls can result in incorrect answers.
- Not properly handling edge cases, such as when the strings are already identical or cannot be scrambled into one another, could lead to unnecessary computation.
Follow-up variants
- Increasing the length of the strings beyond the current constraints to test the performance of the algorithm.
- Modifying the problem to check for scrambled substrings within a larger string rather than the whole string.
- Introducing additional characters or larger alphabets in the strings, potentially testing the space and time efficiency of the solution.
How GhostInterview Helps
- GhostInterview helps by providing real-time feedback and code suggestions to help you refine your solution to the Scramble String problem.
- It guides you in optimizing your recursive solution with dynamic programming and memoization, improving your approach.
- Through tailored problem-solving hints and step-by-step analysis, GhostInterview aids you in understanding complex scenarios in state transition dynamic programming.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the time complexity of solving the Scramble String problem?
The time complexity is O(n^4) due to the memoization technique and the recursive nature of the problem.
How does dynamic programming help in solving Scramble String?
Dynamic programming helps by storing intermediate results of string scrambles, allowing you to avoid redundant calculations and speeding up the solution process.
What is the main challenge when solving Scramble String?
The main challenge is efficiently managing the recursive calls while checking both swap and non-swap scenarios, which requires careful use of memoization.
Can the Scramble String problem be solved without dynamic programming?
It is possible, but without dynamic programming, the solution would be inefficient, leading to redundant calculations and higher time complexity.
What are some common mistakes when solving Scramble String?
Common mistakes include failing to properly handle recursive cases, neglecting memoization, and missing edge cases like identical or unswappable strings.
Need direct help with Scramble String instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Scramble String from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Decode Ways is a dynamic programming problem focused on decoding a numeric string to letters using specific mappings.
Open problem page#97 Interleaving StringThe Interleaving String problem requires determining if a string can be formed by interleaving two others, utilizing dynamic programming techniques.
Open problem page#72 Edit DistanceDetermine the minimum number of insertions, deletions, or replacements to transform one string into another using dynamic programming.
Open problem page