This problem requires analyzing a sequence of moves on a 2D grid to detect self-crossing efficiently. The solution relies on array manipulation combined with geometric reasoning to identify intersections. Using careful comparisons of distances, you can determine if the path ever overlaps previous segments without simulating every coordinate explicitly.
Problem Statement
You are given an integer array distance representing consecutive steps on a 2D plane. Starting at the origin (0, 0), move distance[0] meters north, then distance[1] meters west, distance[2] meters south, distance[3] meters east, and continue changing direction counter-clockwise after each step.
Return true if the path crosses itself at any point, meaning a move overlaps a previous segment. Otherwise, return false. Analyze the pattern of distances to detect intersections efficiently without full coordinate tracking.
Examples
Example 1
Input: distance = [2,1,1,2]
Output: true
The path crosses itself at the point (0, 1).
Example 2
Input: distance = [1,2,3,4]
Output: false
The path does not cross itself at any point.
Example 3
Input: distance = [1,1,1,2,1]
Output: true
The path crosses itself at the point (0, 0).
Constraints
- 1 <= distance.length <= 105
- 1 <= distance[i] <= 105
Solution Approach
Iterative Distance Comparison
Check each step against up to three previous steps to detect a crossing. Compare current distance with distances three or four steps back to identify overlap patterns that cause self-crossing.
Pattern-Based Detection
Use the array plus math pattern to classify potential crossing scenarios into three cases: simple loop, tight overlap, and extended overlap. Apply conditional checks directly on distance values without extra memory.
Constant Space Implementation
Optimize the solution to O(1) space by only tracking the last six distances. Update variables as you iterate through the array and evaluate crossing conditions in real-time.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n) since each distance is evaluated once against a constant number of prior distances. Space complexity is O(1) using fixed variables to track previous steps instead of simulating coordinates.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Are you considering edge cases where the path touches but does not cross previous segments?
- Notice if your solution handles sequences that expand then contract, creating potential intersections.
- Can you simplify checks by using only the last few distances instead of full coordinate storage?
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Simulating full coordinates unnecessarily increases space usage and complexity.
- Failing to check the fourth or fifth previous distance can miss overlapping loops.
- Incorrectly assuming only consecutive steps can cause crossing ignores geometric patterns.
Follow-up variants
- Detect self-crossing in a 3D path with directional changes in three axes.
- Find the first step where the path crosses itself and return its index.
- Determine if a path is self-avoiding given a repeated move sequence of arbitrary length.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Automatically applies array plus math patterns to flag potential self-crossing cases instantly.
- Highlights which previous distances are relevant for each step, reducing human error in conditional checks.
- Provides concise reasoning for each decision, helping identify pattern-based failures quickly.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What does 'Self Crossing' mean in this problem?
It means the path on the 2D plane intersects a segment previously traversed, detected using distance comparisons in array order.
Can I use extra memory to store coordinates?
While possible, the optimal approach tracks only the last six distances, achieving O(1) space without full coordinate storage.
Why do we check distances up to three or four steps back?
Crossings can occur from loops formed by the current step overlapping segments three or four moves prior, so those comparisons catch all patterns.
Does the solution work for large arrays up to 10^5 elements?
Yes, the O(n) time and O(1) space approach scales efficiently, evaluating each step once with constant comparisons.
Is this a typical array plus math pattern problem?
Yes, it requires combining sequential array analysis with geometric reasoning to detect intersections without simulating every point.
Need direct help with Self Crossing instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Self Crossing from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Determine if given axis-aligned rectangles form a perfect cover using array scanning and hash-based corner counting techniques.
Open problem page#149 Max Points on a LineFind the maximum number of points on a straight line in a 2D plane using array scanning and hash lookup.
Open problem page#587 Erect the FenceFind the perimeter fence of a garden by determining the outermost trees in a set of given tree coordinates.
Open problem page