Scan the messages array while updating a hash table to count total words per sender. Track the sender with the highest word count dynamically, resolving ties by lexicographical order. This method ensures linear time processing with minimal overhead, directly reflecting the problem's array scanning plus hash lookup pattern.
Problem Statement
You are given two arrays of strings: messages and senders. Each messages[i] is a single message sent by senders[i]. Messages contain words separated by single spaces with no leading or trailing spaces.
Calculate the total number of words each sender has sent. Return the sender with the largest word count. If multiple senders share the largest count, return the sender with the lexicographically largest name.
Examples
Example 1
Input: messages = ["Hello userTwooo","Hi userThree","Wonderful day Alice","Nice day userThree"], senders = ["Alice","userTwo","userThree","Alice"]
Output: "Alice"
Alice sends a total of 2 + 3 = 5 words. userTwo sends a total of 2 words. userThree sends a total of 3 words. Since Alice has the largest word count, we return "Alice".
Example 2
Input: messages = ["How is leetcode for everyone","Leetcode is useful for practice"], senders = ["Bob","Charlie"]
Output: "Charlie"
Bob sends a total of 5 words. Charlie sends a total of 5 words. Since there is a tie for the largest word count, we return the sender with the lexicographically larger name, Charlie.
Constraints
- n == messages.length == senders.length
- 1 <= n <= 104
- 1 <= messages[i].length <= 100
- 1 <= senders[i].length <= 10
- messages[i] consists of uppercase and lowercase English letters and ' '.
- All the words in messages[i] are separated by a single space.
- messages[i] does not have leading or trailing spaces.
- senders[i] consists of uppercase and lowercase English letters only.
Solution Approach
Count Words Per Sender
Iterate through messages, split each message by spaces to determine word count, and update a hash table mapping senders to their cumulative word counts.
Determine Maximum Sender
Traverse the hash table entries to find the sender with the highest word count. In case of ties, compare sender names lexicographically and select the largest.
Return the Result
After scanning all entries, return the sender identified as having the largest word count, reflecting correct handling of tie-breakers and array scanning plus hash lookup logic.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n * m) where n is the number of messages and m is the average number of words per message due to splitting. Space complexity is O(k) for storing counts per sender, with k being the number of unique senders.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Focus on efficient word counting with split operations and hash table aggregation.
- Tie-breaking logic using lexicographical comparison is a critical detail.
- Expect attention to cumulative counts across multiple messages per sender.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to correctly count words by misinterpreting spaces or not handling multiple messages per sender.
- Ignoring tie-breakers and returning the first maximum instead of lexicographically largest.
- Updating counts incorrectly in the hash table, overwriting instead of accumulating.
Follow-up variants
- Return the sender with the smallest word count instead of the largest.
- Identify multiple senders with the top word count and return them in a sorted array.
- Handle messages containing punctuation or multiple consecutive spaces requiring custom splitting logic.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Automatically counts words per sender and maintains running totals to avoid manual hash updates.
- Resolves ties using lexicographical comparison, reflecting exact problem tie-breaking rules.
- Highlights failure modes like missing cumulative counts or incorrect word splitting during array scanning.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
How do I count words efficiently in Sender With Largest Word Count?
Use string split by space and sum lengths per sender in a hash table for O(n * m) processing.
What if multiple senders have the same maximum word count?
Select the sender with the lexicographically largest name as the tie-breaker according to problem rules.
Does the order of messages matter for the result?
No, the total word count per sender is cumulative and independent of message order.
Can I optimize space usage for many senders?
Yes, only store counts for unique senders in the hash table, which reduces memory for large n.
What is the key pattern for solving this problem?
The main pattern is array scanning plus hash lookup, counting words per sender while updating totals efficiently.
Need direct help with Sender With Largest Word Count instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Sender With Largest Word Count from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Find the maximum-length palindrome by combining two-letter words using array scanning and hash table lookups efficiently.
Open problem page#2085 Count Common Words With One OccurrenceLearn how to efficiently count strings appearing exactly once in both arrays using array scanning and hash lookup patterns.
Open problem page#2506 Count Pairs Of Similar StringsCount similar string pairs by converting each word into a character-set signature and counting matching signatures efficiently.
Open problem page