In this problem, you'll implement a binary search to find the integer square root of a given non-negative integer. You can't use built-in functions. The goal is to return the largest integer whose square is less than or equal to the input number.
Problem Statement
Given a non-negative integer x, you need to return the square root of x rounded down to the nearest integer. The result should be non-negative, and you cannot use any built-in exponent functions or operators for the solution.
For example, when x is 4, the square root is exactly 2, so the output is 2. In contrast, when x is 8, the square root is approximately 2.82842, so rounding it down gives 2 as the correct output.
Examples
Example 1
Input: x = 4
Output: 2
The square root of 4 is 2, so we return 2.
Example 2
Input: x = 8
Output: 2
The square root of 8 is 2.82842..., and since we round it down to the nearest integer, 2 is returned.
Constraints
- 0 <= x <= 231 - 1
Solution Approach
Binary Search Approach
The optimal approach involves performing binary search over the valid answer space. Since we know that the square root of x lies between 0 and x, we can narrow down the range using binary search. For each mid-point in the range, we compare mid*mid with x to determine if the square root is smaller, larger, or equal.
Edge Cases
Consider edge cases like x = 0 or x = 1. These are straightforward since the square root of 0 is 0, and the square root of 1 is 1. You need to handle these efficiently without unnecessary computations.
Time Complexity Considerations
Using binary search reduces the problem's time complexity to O(log x), as we halve the search space at each step. This is a significant improvement over a linear search, which would take O(x) time.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity of the binary search approach is O(log x), as we reduce the search space by half at each step. The space complexity is O(1), as only a few variables are used to track the binary search bounds and the result.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- The candidate understands binary search and can apply it in mathematical problems.
- The candidate efficiently handles edge cases, like x = 0 and x = 1.
- The candidate explains the reasoning behind the time complexity and avoids unnecessary brute-force solutions.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Using built-in square root functions, which contradicts the problem constraints.
- Not considering edge cases, especially when x is 0 or 1.
- Misunderstanding the rounding requirement, failing to correctly handle non-perfect squares.
Follow-up variants
- Implementing this with iterative search rather than binary search.
- Handling very large values of x near the upper bound of the constraints.
- Returning results in floating-point rather than integer form.
How GhostInterview Helps
- Provides step-by-step guidance on applying binary search to problems with a numeric range.
- Offers hints on handling edge cases and ensuring correct rounding behavior.
- Gives a detailed explanation of time and space complexity to strengthen algorithmic understanding.
Topic Pages
Related GhostInterview Pages
- LeetCode Interview Copilot - Use GhostInterview as a live solver when you want direct help with LeetCode-style coding questions.
- Coding Interview Assistant - See how GhostInterview supports array, string, linked list, graph, and tree interview workflows.
- How GhostInterview Works - Review the screenshot, reasoning, and answer flow before using the solver in a live interview.
FAQ
What is the optimal approach for solving Sqrt(x)?
The optimal solution is binary search, which allows narrowing the search space for the square root efficiently without using built-in functions.
How do I handle edge cases like x = 0 or x = 1?
For x = 0, the square root is 0, and for x = 1, the square root is 1. These cases are straightforward and can be handled before applying binary search.
Why can't I use built-in exponentiation functions?
The problem explicitly asks not to use any built-in exponentiation functions or operators, which encourages you to implement a more fundamental approach such as binary search.
How do I ensure the output is rounded down to the nearest integer?
During the binary search, when you find a mid-point, you need to check if mid*mid is less than or equal to x. If it exceeds, adjust the bounds accordingly.
What is the time complexity of the binary search approach?
The time complexity of the binary search approach is O(log x), which is much more efficient than a brute force solution.
Need direct help with Sqrt(x) instead of spending more time grinding it?
Download GhostInterview when you want a LeetCode solver, not another long practice loop. Capture Sqrt(x) from a screenshot, get the answer path and complexity, and use supported stealth workflows that stay outside captured layers.
Capture the prompt fast instead of rewriting the problem by hand.
Get the solution path, trade-offs, and complexity summary in one pass.
Stay outside captured layers on supported screen-share workflows.
Stay in the same pattern family
Find the missing number in an array containing distinct numbers in the range [0, n].
Open problem page#367 Valid Perfect SquareDetermine if a given positive integer is a perfect square using a binary search approach over potential square roots efficiently.
Open problem page#400 Nth DigitGiven n, efficiently find the nth digit in the infinite integer sequence using a binary search over valid positions.
Open problem page